The Cross-Border Institute at the University of Windsor

4 weeks ago

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Office of Field Operations - Detroit Field Office will be
hosting the 8th Annual Trade Day at COBO Center on Tuesday, August 13, 2019 from 7:30 a.m.
until 3:30 p.m. For more info visit go.usa.gov/xmhgm ... See MoreSee Less

The Cross-Border Institute at the University of Windsor

4 months ago

Special Advisor to CBI, Laurie Tannous, will be a panelist along with the Embassy of Mexico and Global Affairs Canada, as they explore various facets of the Canada-Mexico relationship. ... See MoreSee Less

The Cross-Border Institute at the University of Windsor

4 months ago

The University of Windsor spotlights accomplishments and achievements of faculty at an annual event held to pay tribute to those who have received significant awards and honours for their research or creative activity.

We are happy to celebrate with two recipients this year.

Congratulations

Dr. Hanna Maoh
Health Canada – Integrated Urban Modeling Project

Cross-Border Institute
Scotiabank Global Trade Transaction Initiative

A full list of honourees can be viewed in the link below. ... See MoreSee Less

The Cross-Border Institute at the University of Windsor

5 months ago

The Cross Border Institute at the University of Windsor is receiving funding for research into financial transactions.

Scotiabank is investing $500,000 in the research over five years. ... See MoreSee Less

The Cross-Border Institute at the University of Windsor

5 months ago

CBI's Laurie Tannous is quoted in this article from the Globe and Mail.

What to do about the Irish border? Canada-U.S. border technology examined as U.K. seeks solution to Brexit impasse

PAUL WALDIEEUROPE CORRESPONDENT
LONDON
PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 7, 2019
UPDATED FEBRUARY 8, 2019

British Prime Minister Theresa May is meeting European Union leaders this week in a desperate bid to salvage her Brexit deal, and she’s banking on a handful of proposals including some linked to Canada.

Ms. May is shuttling from Brussels to Dublin in order to try and break the logjam over the Brexit withdrawal agreement which is facing fierce opposition from British parliamentarians. She’s had little success so far and there’s less than two months to go before the U.K. leaves the EU on March 29. EU leaders have refused to make any changes to the agreement and before Ms. May even arrived in Brussels on Thursday, EU Council President Donald Tusk, who represents the leaders, lashed out at Brexit hardliners. “I’ve been wondering what that special place in hell looks like, for those who promoted Brexit, without even a sketch of a plan of how to carry it out safely,” Mr. Tusk told reporters on Wednesday.

Ms. May has vowed to press ahead and she’s determined the U.K. will leave the EU next month with some kind of an agreement. But the main stumbling block looks as intractable as ever: The Prime Minister has to find a way to keep the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland completely open after Brexit. And she has to do it in a way that satisfies the EU, Ireland and dozens of fellow Conservative Party members of Parliament who, along with opposition MPs, have blocked parliamentary approval of the agreement.

The Irish border has been free of all restrictions ever since the 1998 Good Friday Agreement which ended decades of sectarian violence known as the Troubles. No one wants a return to a hard border - which would involve customs checks - and the EU has insisted that the withdrawal agreement must include a special provision known as the backstop which would guarantee the border remained open after Brexit. To do that the backstop would keep Northern Ireland tied to the EU’s regulations and standards while the rest of the U.K. formed a customs arrangement with the bloc that would allow the free movement of goods, but not services. The backstop would remain in place until the EU and U.K. reached a comprehensive trade deal, which could take years.

Ms. May initially agreed to the backstop but she’s had to backtrack in the face of growing opposition from Tory MPs. They argue the provision could keep the U.K. linked to the EU indefinitely, which defeats the purpose of Brexit. They want the backstop scrapped or modified with a time limit or an amendment that permitted the U.K. to terminate it.

The critics have put Ms. May in a corner. She doesn’t want a hard border either but in order to appease Tory MPs she has to find a solution that involves changing or removing the backstop, something the EU has refused to consider. She’s come up with a few proposals to get around the issue and she’s raising them with the EU this week.

The first is to find some alternative arrangement that could replace the backstop. That could include adopting the technology currently in place along the Canada-U.S. border between Windsor, Ont., and Detroit. Brexit backers have long argued that the Canadian border demonstrates that there are technological solutions the U.K. and Ireland could use that would keep the boundary frictionless and avoid the need for the backstop. Former Brexit Secretary David Davis gushed about the Canadian border after a visit to Windsor in 2017. “I looked at the crossing times: 54 seconds. I looked at the mechanisms: easy, cheap, 15 years old,” he told a parliamentary committee after his visit. “Even in the most difficult environment, it worked very well.”

Canadian border expert Laurie Tannous agrees that the Windsor-Detroit border could be an example for the U.K. to follow, but it wouldn’t be a quick fix. “In terms of everything I hear with what’s happening with Brexit, I do think technology is the solution,” said Ms. Tannous, a special adviser to the University of Windsor’s Cross-Border Institute, who ran a four-day workshop on the Canadian border with British officials in Belfast in 2017. “However, I think it’s going to take time to implement because that’s been the biggest lesson with Canada and the U.S. and our border; we are seeing all these technological advances, there is less friction, but it takes time to get there.”

There are certainly big differences between the Canada-U.S. and Irish borders. Around 11 million cars and trucks cross the Windsor-Detroit boundary every year, roughly double the number of crossings along the entire Irish border. There are also passport controls and a customs booth which don’t exist in Ireland. The 500-kilometre Irish border is invisible, existing only on maps where it crisscrosses through farm fields and houses. More than 20,000 people live on one side of the Irish border and work on the other side.

Nonetheless, the Canada-U.S. border could be the future for the Irish border because technology has made it as frictionless as possible. Both countries have spent more than a decade streamlining the crossings for commercial vehicles, largely through the introduction of trusted-trader regimes. Under these programs, drivers, trucking companies and importers apply to officials in Canada and the U.S. for a risk assessment. Once approved, drivers can use a special lane at the border and they only need to produce bar-coded documents which can be scanned by border officers. Ms. Tannous said a new pilot program will take the automation further. “It’s an electronic lane where there’s not even an officer,” she said. Instead, equipment will scan bar codes on trucks, read licence plates and automatically check a driver’s documents. The Nexus program offers similar electronic access for approved travellers and the Canada Border Services Agency is making greater use of facial recognition software.

Not everyone agrees the high-tech Canadian border is the answer for Ireland. Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar ruled out the possibility of a Canadian-style border after a visit to Windsor last year. It was “high tech and highly efficient,” he said. “But make no mistake - it’s a hard border. That is definitely not a solution that we can possibly entertain.” The EU has also rejected the idea and said there weren’t any technological solutions currently available that would provide the same sort of frictionless border that currently exists.

Another option Ms. May is considering is to modify the backstop by using a “joint interpretative instrument.” Canadian and EU officials came up with that idea in 2016 to get the Belgian province of Wallonia onside during ratification of the Canada-EU trade deal, known as the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. At the time the Walloon parliament refused to give its consent to the deal over concerns about several issues including the dispute settlement process. The opposition threatened to scupper the agreement because the EU required unanimous consent from member states and Belgium couldn’t ratify without Wallonia’s approval. The provincial legislature only agreed after Canada and the EU added a joint interpretative instrument to the agreement that provided a binding interpretation of the deal to address the issues.

Since the EU has refused to change the Brexit withdrawal agreement, Ms. May is hoping that a similar interpretative instrument could be added to the deal to put a time limit on the backstop. Her officials have been working on a proposal but Canadian trade expert Jason Langrish doubts it will work. “To be frank, it was really a political gambit to allow Wallonia’s premier to save face and not be accused of caving in his attempts to block CETA’s signature by the EU,” he said, adding that Brexit was a completely different situation. “I guess it’s worth a try but I suspect it would be too little, too late.” The plan has also run into criticism from Tory MPs who say only a clear change to the withdrawal agreement will be enough. “If all we see is a codicil – a ‘joint interpretive instrument’ – expect a further substantial defeat for the agreement,” said Tory MP Steve Baker.

Ms. May doesn’t have much time to find a solution. She is due to report back to Parliament on Feb. 13 and MPs could then move motions to take over the Brexit process by holding a referendum, delaying Brexit or cancelling it. ... See MoreSee Less